Since entering my records on CATE2 for the last few years and examining the data I've noticed that around 140 records are dated 00/00/0, and 4 are between the years 201 and 1077. Some of the 00/00/0 records are labelled in red, ie Rubroboletus legaliae.
Are there any plans to correct the dates, or is this not considered a large enough number to affect the quality of the data?
Thanks, Sue